How technology adoption makes Canada’s food system more affordable, competitive, and shock resistant.
Canada’s food supply chains are a matter of national security, economic productivity, and grocery affordability — and all three are under threat. A decade of compounding disruptions — pandemic, extreme weather, shipping crises, and now the disintegration of stable trade relations with our closest and largest partner — has exposed the systemic fragility of Canada’s food system. Our country is one of the world’s largest agricultural producers, but it has outsourced much of the processing, technology, and infrastructure that turns those raw agricultural inputs into the food Canadians rely on. That dependency means the food system absorbs the full force of every global disruption, and Canadian consumers pay for it at the grocery store.
This is not a temporary problem. Decades of underinvestment in value-added processing capacity, technology adoption, and sector-wide modernization have left Canada’s food sector — overwhelmingly small- and medium-sized businesses, operating on thin margins — without the support to build the operational resilience needed to respond to disruptions.
The good news is that the Canadian food innovation ecosystem is building the processing capabilities, operational technologies, and digital solutions needed to address the sector’s supply chain vulnerabilities. This report maps this innovation landscape across three key dimensions of supply chain resilience — domestic processing capacity, operational efficiency, and supply chain visibility and traceability. It makes the case that sustained investment in validating, scaling, and deploying these technologies across the sector is what’s needed for Canada to secure a resilient, sovereign food system that better serves all Canadians.
The food supply chain encompasses everything between the farm and the fork: processing plants that turn raw commodities into usable ingredients, packaging operations that protect and preserve, cold chain logistics that maintain safety across thousands of kilometres, and distribution networks connecting manufacturers to retailers and restaurants. While this is often conceptualized as a literal chain — a series of discrete, linear steps — it operates more like a web or matrix. Every node depends on multiple others: a processor’s output is shaped by supplier availability, equipment uptime, labour capacity, regulatory requirements, and logistics schedules. A tariff on a single imported input can cascade through formulation, packaging, pricing, and shelf availability months later. These interconnections are what make food supply chains so vulnerable: they behave as complex systems, not linear processes, and building resilience requires treating them accordingly.
Canada is among the world’s largest agricultural producers. But the food supply chain that connects that production to Canadian consumers has a fundamental imbalance: strong at the farm gate, weak in the middle. The midstream processing that turns raw commodities into finished food products — the extraction, formulation, packaging, and value-added work that determines cost, quality, and supply continuity — is disproportionately located beyond our borders. For instance, Canada is the world’s number one exporter of dried peas, yet 88 percent of production over the past five years has been exported as a raw commodity — a significant missed opportunity for domestic value creation, job growth, and export diversification.1
With so much of the supply chain’s middle located outside Canada, the food system is exposed to every tariff, currency swing, and natural disaster that the last five years have made routine. A recent assessment by KPMG states it bluntly: Canada does not have an independent food supply chain, and has significantly underinvested in the commerce, data, and technology infrastructure that complex supply chains require.2 Grocery prices have risen roughly 22 percent since 2022 — nearly double broader inflation — with the Bank of Canada identifying import costs as the primary driver of 2025’s food price increases.3 These pressures take six to nine months to work through the supply chain, meaning current trade uncertainty has not even fully arrived at the checkout line.
The dependency would matter less if Canada’s domestic food sector were well-capitalized or technologically advanced. It is neither. Of roughly 6,900 food and beverage processing establishments, 92 percent are SMEs with fewer than 100 employees.4 Across Canadian SMEs broadly, capital investment in machinery and equipment has declined 16 percent over the past decade, and business productivity fell 0.6 percent from 2019 to 2024 while U.S. productivity rose 10.1 percent.5,6 The food sector reflects these trends acutely — thin margins, manual processes, and minimal automation remain the norm for most processors, distributors, and food service operators. The barriers to investment are well documented and self-reinforcing: high equipment costs, constrained cash flow, lack of digital skills, and difficulty finding solutions that fit specific operations.
The capital gap extends beyond equipment. Although the 2025 federal budget identified agri-food as a key sector where Canada enjoys a strategic global advantage, 7 agri-food accounts for less than two percent of government-backed growth, venture, and infrastructure funds at the federal level and captured only four percent of total growth capital invested in Canada over the past five years.1 Investment values are down 32 percent and deal counts down 29 percent relative to a decade ago. The sector is growing — year-over-year revenue growth in agri-food manufacturing has averaged 5.9 percent over the past decade, outpacing the 3.6 percent manufacturing average — but capital is not keeping pace. The consequence is a food system that is simultaneously dependent on foreign processing and unable to grow and modernize its own capabilities quickly enough.
Closing this gap will require investing in the domestic processing capacity, operational technology, and supply chain infrastructure that Canada has long neglected. The evidence that this investment pays off is strong. EU-wide research spanning all 27 member states from 2011 to 2024 found that technological progress in the food sector — including digital tools, cold chain infrastructure, real-time market information, processing automation, and logistics systems — significantly reduces both food price levels and food price inflation. Countries with stronger technological capacities across these domains are demonstrably better equipped to manage cost fluctuations while maintaining stable prices for consumers.8
But the same study found an important constraint: supply chain technology reduces prices and inflation, but it does not on its own eliminate the systemic volatility caused by external shocks. The resilience effect only materializes when technology is embedded in institutional structures — collaborative partnerships, knowledge-sharing mechanisms, and coordinated deployment programs — that ensure innovation reaches the firms and regions that need it, rather than concentrating gains among early adopters.
For Canada’s food sector, this means the path to resilient supply chains requires organizations and programs that span the full innovation cycle: funding and validating emerging technologies with industry partners and accelerating deployment of proven solutions across the thousands of processors, distributors, and operators that cannot navigate the process alone.
The following sections map the Canadian innovation landscape across three dimensions of supply chain resilience. Each profiles companies building solutions in that area, many with support from Canadian Food Innovation Network (CFIN) programs, and illustrates how early-stage validation and ecosystem support translate into commercial traction that the broader sector can build on.
Import costs were the primary driver of 2025’s food price increases, and the structural reason is that the processing which determines cost, quality, and supply continuity happens disproportionately beyond our borders. With a weak Canadian dollar, every ingredient, component, and finished product sourced internationally costs more — a premium that Canadian processors, distributors, and retailers absorb or pass directly to consumers.
Building a more resilient food supply chain begins with closing that processing gap by investing in the technologies, ingredient capabilities, and production models that keep more value in Canada and reduce exposure to foreign cost volatility.
Maia Farms produces oyster mushroom mycelium and pea protein ingredients that Canadian food manufacturers are using as direct replacements for soy- and wheat-based textured proteins typically imported from the U.S. or Asia. The company’s protein products can already supply a plated serving below the cost of both beef and chicken mince. 9
CFIN’s Foodtech Next program funded the pilot that moved Maia from lab-scale R&D to commercial production with Big Mountain Foods. In 2025, the company closed an oversubscribed $3.75 million seed round led by Active Impact Investments. They have scaled production to 200,000 kilograms annually, with Canadian manufacturers increasingly replacing imported textured proteins with Maia’s domestic alternative. That includes Sprague Foods, a fifth-generation, family-owned business and one of Canada’s last independent producers of canned organic soups, beans, and chilis, which now uses Maia’s ingredients in its plant-based product lines.
Maia’s success in creating markets for Canadian-grown inputs is helping drive investment in processing capacity upstream. The company has partnered with Alberta-based Phytokana Ingredients, backed by $32.5 million from Protein Industries Canada, to process Canadian-grown fava beans at a new 30,000 metric tonne facility near Strathmore, Alberta and ferment them into finished, high-protein, high-fibre ingredients — a fully domestic value chain from raw crop to shelf-ready product.
Coffee shops across Canada pay to dispose of spent coffee grounds — heavy, wet waste that is often their single largest byproduct by volume. Nova Scotia-based RFINE has developed a drying technology that converts those grounds into Kaffika, a food-grade cocoa extender that replaces imported cocoa products whose prices have surged in recent years.
CFIN’s Innovation Booster program funded a $205,000 pre-commercial pilot that demonstrated the process across multiple quick-service coffee locations. The technology is now running at Java Blend Coffee, an independently owned Halifax roaster that has supplied freshly roasted coffee to over 400 businesses across Atlantic Canada for more than 85 years. RFINE’s system processes Java Blend’s spent grounds on-site, and the resulting Kaffika goes back into the cafe’s own bakery — a circular model where the waste from brewing becomes an ingredient in the pastry case. It eliminates a waste cost for operators while reducing reliance on an imported commodity input that Canadian manufacturers have no control over.
In 2025, RFINE closed an oversubscribed $1.7 million equity round to scale commercialization.
In 2023, McCain Foods committed $600 million to expand its Coaldale, Alberta potato processing plant, the largest investment in the company’s 65-year history. The expansion doubles the facility’s size and workforce, adding 260 jobs and two tech-enabled production lines.
McCain has also worked with CFIN to scout the Canadian innovation landscape for emerging technologies that can improve its broader operations. McCain has the capital, the R&D capacity, and the ecosystem access to find, evaluate, and adopt new technology. Consider what it would mean if the rest of the sector — Canada’s thousands of small and mid-sized processors — had the support to identify the right technologies, validate them in their own operations, and invest in the kind of homegrown modernization solutions that major players like McCain can pursue. Facilitating that support is how Canada builds processing capacity at a national scale.
Building domestic processing capacity only delivers resilience if the operators running that capacity are productive enough to absorb cost pressure without passing it through to consumers. Most small and mid-sized processors still operate using manual inspection, fixed-labour packaging lines, and minimal production data — operations where costs stay flat or rise with volume instead of falling.
The companies cited below are building the automation, production intelligence, and quality control systems that help maximize what Canadian food processors could produce compared to what they currently do.
Relocalize builds autonomous micro-factories that produce food and beverage products directly at retailer distribution centres, removing costly cold chain middle-mile transportation from the supply chain entirely. The first application is packaged ice — a heavy, logistics-intensive product where a single factory currently serves all of Quebec — but the platform is designed for any water-based product, with cold packs and beverages next. Production at the point of distribution cuts product cost by up to 50 percent and transportation emissions by 70 to 80 percent. 10 CFIN funded the initial pilot, then supported the digital command-and-control infrastructure needed to manage multiple factory units remotely through a second funding round. The company has since closed an oversubscribed $5.8 million seed round and is deploying commercially in Canada and the United States.
uDesign Solutions is piloting a next-generation pick-and-place automation system for dairy packaging with Laiterie de l’Outaouais through CFIN’s Foodtech Next program. The system automates crate packing at the end of the bottling line — a stage that scales linearly with labour cost in most small- and mid-sized dairy operations. uDesign’s system handles multiple bottle sizes and crate configurations with minimal changeover, integrates sensors and adaptive AI for real-time optimization and predictive maintenance, and gives operators a live dashboard with production analytics and proactive alerts. The project is designed explicitly for broader adoption across packaging facilities — a scalable model, not a one-off installation.
Most small and mid-sized food distributors run their operations on spreadsheets, legacy software, and manual ordering. Arbia (formerly Stocky AI) is building an AI-powered operating platform that consolidates procurement, inventory, ordering, route planning, and traceability into one system for these businesses. The platform is already in use at Jasmine Foods, a BC-based Mediterranean food distributor that was expanding from retail into wholesale without accurate data on profit margins or true cost of goods sold. After deploying this technology, Jasmine Foods is now expanding into a new region without additional staff by automating procurement, ordering, and fulfilment through Arbia’s platform.
Domestic processing capacity and operational efficiency address the production side of resilience. But a supply chain is only as responsive as the information flowing through it. When a disruption hits, the first question is always: what do we have, where is it, and how fast can we reroute? For most of Canada’s food sector, the honest answers are we do not know, and not fast enough.
Canada’s National Supply Chain Task Force identified digital innovation as one of its three major recommendations, and traceability is becoming a prerequisite for facilitating international trade.11,12 The companies in this section are building the data infrastructure, procurement platforms, and physical traceability systems that will enable a more responsive and adaptable food supply chain.
When contamination occurs, the inability to trace product movement precisely means retailers must issue blanket recalls instead of targeted ones, costing the industry millions per incident and destroying product that may be perfectly safe for consumer consumption. Index Biosystems uses biotechnology to turn inactive baker’s yeast into microscopic barcodes — BioTags — that create a secure, physical link between a product and its supply chain data. Applied to grain in a CFIN-funded pilot, the tags move with the commodity through the supply chain, providing origin verification and contamination pathway tracing that digital-only systems can’t replicate because they track documentation, not the product itself. The company has raised $5 million in an oversubscribed round led by KdT Ventures to expand across food categories.
Most seafood processors still rely on handwritten records, legacy software, and spreadsheets to track what moves through their plants — systems that can’t keep pace with the dynamic costing, variable yields, and real-time inventory demands of fish processing. ThisFish builds software and computer vision systems that replace those manual processes with real-time production tracking, traceability, and quality inspection.
The company’s Tally platform is used by Canadian processors like Orca Specialty Foods, where it tracks every tote and pallet through inventory, production, and shipment using QR-coded labels and scanners. Because fish prices and yields fluctuate by quality and lot, Tally runs a dynamic costing model that automatically calculates blended raw material costs in real time — something standard ERP and accounting software cannot do. The result is real-time cost control over finished goods, automated inventory reconciliation across third-party cold storage, and production data that feeds directly into financial reporting.
Supported by nearly $200,000 across two funding rounds of CFIN’s Innovation Booster program, ThisFish is now expanding its AI model library — smart cameras mounted on production lines that continuously photograph every fish or fillet and classify by size, colour, and quality, catching defects mid-run rather than after the fact. The system generates the digital traceability records that the sector increasingly needs without adding administrative burden to processors already running on thin margins.
The supply chain visibility gap hits hardest at the margins. Small food businesses in rural and northern communities have the least access to real-time pricing, the weakest purchasing leverage, and the longest exposure to brokerage markups — costs that flow directly to consumers in those markets. Jitto connects growers to independent buyers through a digital marketplace that replaces phone-based quoting with real-time pricing from source, AI-driven buyer profiles built from purchase history and seasonal demand, and direct procurement that cuts out one or two layers of traditional intermediary markup. CFIN-funded pilots are running in southwestern Ontario linking Niagara Greenbelt growers to independent restaurants and grocers, with Prairie expansion planned for 2026.
The companies profiled across these three pillars represent different stages of the innovation cycle — some are piloting, some are deploying commercially, some have raised significant private capital on the strength of validated technology. The patterns across them are as instructive as the individual examples.
CFIN occupies a unique position in Canada’s food innovation ecosystem. The network’s 8,000+ members span the full food value chain — processors, distributors, food service operators, retailers, technology companies, investors, and innovators. Since 2021, CFIN has invested $22.6 million in 122 food technology projects, matched by $25.9 million from industry partners. CFIN-funded companies have gone on to receive a total $82 million in private follow-on investments.
Through funding, validating, and commercializing food technology across our network, CFIN has identified three patterns that should inform how Canada invests in food supply chain resilience.
First, Canada’s food innovation landscape is more capable than most policymakers realize, but it is not yet sufficient. Canadian companies are building necessary solutions to urgent supply chain vulnerabilities. Some are commercially deployed. Many more need industry validation, operational testing, and supported first deployments to prove they work at scale. The pipeline is promising, but it needs sustained investment from early development through to sector-wide adoption.
Second, the food sector’s “missing middle” is both its biggest vulnerability and its biggest opportunity. Canada’s 573 medium-sized food processing enterprises — firms with 100 to 499 employees — generate $18.4 billion in sales and are heavily trade-oriented, with exports accounting for 71 percent of their revenue.4 These are the firms best positioned to adopt new technologies, scale domestic processing capacity, and grow into the anchor processors Canada needs. But there are far too few of them, and they face the same capital constraints as the rest of the sector.
Third, supply chain technology investment requires commitment and duration to pay off. The relationship between digital infrastructure and food supply chain resilience is not linear — it requires sustained investment above a minimum threshold before system-level benefits materialize.13 Short-term or fragmented funding cycles risk producing isolated gains that never compound into sector-wide resilience. The food systems that perform best are those backed by committed, long-term investment in the ecosystem that connects innovation to adoption.
Food affordability is a supply chain problem. When disruption hits an undercapitalized food sector with minimal domestic processing and little operational flexibility, the cost has nowhere to go but to the consumer. That is the system Canada has now. Building resilience across the three dimensions mapped in this report is how that changes. Not a food system where prices never rise, but one where every global trade dispute, pandemic, and natural disaster does not exacerbate the affordability crisis weighing on all Canadians.
Countries that once treated food processing and supply chain infrastructure as private sector concerns are now treating them as industrial strategy. The Netherlands, with a fraction of Canada’s agricultural land, became one of the world’s largest food exporters through decades of sustained public investment in processing technology, supply chain infrastructure, and the institutions connecting research to industry. Finland, Japan, and the United Arab Emirates are now making similar commitments, explicitly linking food security to productivity and industrial policy. The UAE alone has committed to attracting $48 billion by 2045 for its agriculture, food, and water sectors.1
Canada has the agricultural base to compete with any of them. What it lacks is the downstream processing capacity, operational technology, and deployment infrastructure to match. The companies profiled here are proof that Canadian innovation can change this. What is needed is committed, sustained investment in the validation and deployment ecosystem that turns their work into sector-wide transformation.
Canada’s food supply chain vulnerabilities are structural. The dependency on foreign processing, chronic underinvestment in domestic capacity, and a fragmented sector of small businesses operating on thin margins are features of the current system, not passing conditions. Every disruption compounds them, and the cost eventually lands on Canadian families.
The path to a more resilient, productive, and sovereign food system is visible. Canadian companies are building the processing capacity, operational technology, and supply chain infrastructure to address these vulnerabilities. The innovation is real and commercially grounded — with sustained support, the pipeline will continue to grow. What is missing is coordinated, long-term investment in getting innovation to the thousands of processors, distributors, and operators who make up the backbone of Canada’s food sector.
CFIN has demonstrated that catalytic funding, industry validation, and deployment support through a national network translates public investment into operational resilience efficiently and at scale. Canada must champion food supply chain innovation if it hopes to capitalize on agri-food’s potential as a strategic national advantage. Aligning capital with stated priorities — through sustained investment in validation, deployment, and the institutional infrastructure that connects the two — is how the innovation mapped in this report becomes the system-wide resilience that Canada needs.
References
1. RBC. Seeding Scale: Addressing Canada’s Agri-Food Growth Capital Gap, 2026.
2. KPMG. Building a More Resilient Food System in Canada, 2025.
3. Bank of Canada. Understanding the Resurgence of Food Inflation in 2025, 2025.
4. Statistics Canada, Value of Businesses’ Sales, by Industry and Enterprise Size; ISED, Canadian Industry Statistics, Food Manufacturing (NAICS 311), Statistics Canada special tabulation, 2024.
5. Sargent, T.C. Productivity Growth in Canada: What is Going On? The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, 2024.
6. Canadian Federation of Independent Business. Digital Transformation: How Small Businesses in Canada Are Leveraging AI and Technology for Growth and Productivity, 2025.
7. Department of Finance Canada. Budget 2025: Canada Strong, 2025.
8. Doran, N. Boosting Food System Stability Through Technological Progress in Price and Supply Dynamics, 2025.
9. Mridul, A. “Exclusive: Maia Farms Takes Health-First Approach to Mushroom & Mycelium Ingredients.” Green Queen, 2026.
10. Norman, P. “Automated Microfactory Aims to Transform Future of Supply Chains — One Ice Cube at a Time.” The Globe and Mail, 2025.
11. Supply Chain Canada. Adopting Digitization and Its Impact on Skills, 2023.
12. CD Howe Institute. The Reconfiguration of Global Supply Chains: Implications for Canada, 2024.
13. Ding, Z., Yue, H. and Liu, J. Examining the Role of Digital Economy on Supply Chain Resilience: An Empirical Analysis of China’s Food Sector, 2025.
Source: westerngrocer.com