Bridging the divide between food companies’ wants and farmers’ needs

A significant shift towards sustainable farming practices is underway in food and beverage production, spurred by the imperative to address climate change. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 6th assessment report, the global agriculture sector sequesters about 12.5 gigatons of Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) per year. After accounting for agriculture and food manufacturing emissions, that leaves a negative carbon balance of about 5.9 gigatons of CO₂ per year. Yet that is just the tip of the iceberg. The potential for carbon sequestration overall is much greater.

Food and beverage companies are setting ambitious net-zero goals, actively working to reduce their carbon footprint and promote sustainable sourcing practices. These goals align with a global movement towards environmental responsibility and signify a paradigm shift in the industry’s approach to resource management and climate impact. For example, recent regulatory shifts, like the EU deforestation regulation, underscore the industry’s commitment to sustainability by combatting environmental degradation linked to supply chains.

However, a lack of alignment between food and beverage companies’ sustainability aspirations and the fundamental needs of their agricultural suppliers impedes this transformation today. The dichotomy between traditional farming practices deeply ingrained in agricultural communities and the evolving demand of this transformative industry is the root of the problem.

Unearthing farmers’ resistance to sustainable agriculture

Traditional farming methods, handed down through generations, provide a sense of continuity and predictability for suppliers, and shifting from these practices is more than just a technical adjustment. Farmers globally now face the daunting expectations of adopting new, sustainable practices that may not guarantee equivalent crop yields or revenue. It’s a challenge to the very essence of their economic and psychological stability.

Time-honored farming methods, such as crop rotation and agroforestry, are an integral part of the community’s identity. They are not just techniques for cultivating the land; they symbolize a connection to heritage, a sense of continuity, and a source of pride.

Economically, traditional agricultural practices have also provided a degree of predictability and assurance. The shift away from these practices to more sustainable methods, such as regenerative farming and organic cultivation, introduces an element of risk and uncertainty, not to mention often requiring a certain amount of initial investment, such as adopting new equipment, or the costs associated with adhering to specific standards and certifications. This unsettles the economic foundation that has sustained these farming communities for years.

The disconnect between food and beverage companies and their suppliers extends beyond a mere gap in practices; it is a gap in understanding. Food and beverage companies, driven by the urgency to be more environmentally responsible, sometimes fail to fully grasp the multi-faceted challenges faced by their suppliers even when the motive ultimately ensures a better future, food safety, and resilience.

Cultivating change management

Bridging this gap requires a holistic approach to change management. More is needed to mandate new initiatives from the top. Change management requires a collaborative effort – a partnership between stakeholders at every level of the supply chain. Effective change management will include food and beverage companies and farmers, local communities, government agencies, and environmental organizations.

Adjustments in agricultural practices can affect local communities, especially those economically dependent on traditional farming. Through their involvement, community members can raise their concerns and actively participate in the change management solution. Additionally, government agencies play a critical part in shaping agricultural policies. Their involvement ensures that changes align with broader sustainability goals and regulatory frameworks. Similarly, environmental organizations can advocate for sustainable practices and raise awareness about the importance of change within the industry.