Veterinary medicine by video valuable, but has its limits

Over the past decade, telemedicine has transformed veterinary care.

Images and video consultations allow veterinarians to assess cases remotely, provide guidance and help owners make timely decisions when real-time visits or travel aren’t possible.

From managing chronic lameness to monitoring recovery, video has become an invaluable tool.

Read Also

Two images, both taken from above, showing a forage crop, on the left, with 100 per cent canopy cover and, on the right, less than 100 per cent canopy cover.

Look down on forages to realize their true importance

Forage production is a valuable contributor to the Canadian agricultural economy, ranking as Canada’s third most important crop behind only wheat and canola.

Yet telemedicine also highlights the limitations of what can truly be observed through a screen, and the lesson extends far beyond veterinary practice.

Telemedicine videos are a remarkable resource. They allow professionals to provide guidance across distances, evaluate visible injuries and monitor healing progress without immediate travel. They also empower owners to better understand their horses and manage care.

Even as a professional trained to read subtle signs of health, movement and behavior, I’ve found that images and videos are snapshots.

Subtle lameness can be hidden by lighting, camera angles or the horse’s brief effort during filming. Muscular tension, uneven weight-bearing or hoof imbalances may go unnoticed.

Behavioural cues such as stress responses, reluctance or nervous energy often don’t translate through video, especially if the horse is made to ”perform” for the camera.

What appears perfect for a few minutes on video can tell a very different story when the horse is observed throughout its daily life.

At times, the information “not” relayed through technology can unknowingly change outcomes.

Even the most experienced veterinarian cannot rely on video alone. Subtle valuable information such as gait irregularities, tension in the back or limb, or inconsistent behaviour can be missed.

Video is inherently selective, capturing only a fraction of a horse’s reality. While telemedicine is a critical tool, it serves as an introduction to information —not a replacement for first-hand observation.

If professionals cannot fully depend on video for nuanced assessment, horse owners should also be cautious when evaluating a horse for purchase, training or partnership.

Videos, whether part of telemedicine, online sales or training demonstrations, are compelling. They offer convenience, highlight desirable traits and create a sense of immediacy.

Yet no matter how polished or persuasive, they cannot fully represent the living, breathing animal behind the screen.

Online sales videos operate on similar principles.

They are crafted to present a horse at its best, moving fluidly, responding to cue, and often appearing temperamentally perfect.

Editing, camera angles and selective clips enhance this perception. Music and narration can create an emotional pull, further influencing the viewer’s impression.

However, just like telemedicine videos, sales clips are inherently limited. They cannot fully capture a horse’s daily behaviour and temperament, such as how it responds to strangers, interacts with the herd or manages routine stressors.

Subtle soundness issues such as slight lameness, stiffness, hoof imbalances or dental issues may not appear in just a few minutes of footage.

Likewise, management and environmental factors, including turnout, footing and daily care, profoundly influence a horse’s performance and well-being but are often invisible on video.

Even the horse’s emotional energy and connection are difficult to convey. How it relates to humans, responds to attention or communicates discomfort cannot be fully understood from a screen.

Even an honest video tells only part of the story.

A horse may perform well in a filmed moment but behave differently in daily life.

Just as telemedicine videos are a starting point for veterinarians, sales videos need to be considered introductions for potential owners, not complete evaluations.

Owners can take practical steps to bridge the gap between video and reality.

Begin by asking detailed questions about the horse’s daily routine, health history and any previous injuries.

Whenever possible, observe the horse first-hand and consider multiple visits, which allow you to see how the horse responds in different contexts and assess consistency.

Pay close attention to interactions, such as how the horse engages with humans, other horses and its environment because these can reveal important information about temperament and emotional health.

In addition, take a page from veterinarians, who are often particular about the footage they request. Don’t hesitate to ask for specific views, movements or conditions on video, such as trotting in-hand on varied footing, standing square from all angles or lifting feet for inspection in order to gain the most informative perspective before committing to a visit.

Finally, recognize the limitations of video. No clip can substitute for firsthand experience and the tactile assessment that comes from being with the horse in real time.

Video can be a valuable tool without letting it dictate decisions.

Just as veterinarians rely on telemedicine for guidance while recognizing its limits, buyers and horse enthusiasts are best served by treating marketing videos as introductions rather than guarantees.

Video is a valuable tool for evaluation, education and bridging distance, but it cannot replace real-time observation.

Whether in telemedicine or horse sales, it offers a first impression, yet cannot capture the richness of subtle behaviour, nuanced movement or the connection with a living, thinking animal.

A horse is more than a highlight reel — its health, soundness, temperament and suitability are shaped by daily life, environment and interactions.

For veterinarians and prospective owners alike, video is a tool, not a substitute.

Source: producer.com

Share